Do NKT cells control autoimmunity?

Extensive work in the early 90s established the importance of the Th1/Th2 paradigm and showed that Th2 CD4+ lymphocytes can dampen Th1-mediated immune responses. Later experiments highlighted the importance of a new subset of lymphocytes, termed NKT cells, in the regulation of Th2 cell differentiation. These NKT cells are distinct from other thymus-derived lymphocytes in that they express some markers typical of NK cells, as well as a quasi-invariant T cell receptor (TCR) type. Following stimulation of this TCR, NKT cells produce large amounts of IL-4, which drives the differentiation and growth of Th2 cells. This finding suggested that NKT cells could directly control physiological Th2-driven immune responses and thus indirectly regulate Th1-mediated autoimmunity (1, 2). Because NKT cells are abundant in the liver and bone marrow but are present in very small numbers in peripheral lymphoid organs (1, 2), this hypothesis was initially controversial, but it soon received strong support from experiments performed in genetically manipulated mice. In particular, work with mice lacking the β2 microglobulin chain, which are NKT cell–deficient because they lack the MHC class I–restricting element CD1d, indicated that NKT cells are indeed important players in Th2 differentiation and IgE production (3). Moreover, Vα14Jα281 transgenic mice, which harbour a large population of NKT cells, show heightened Th2 polarization and high serum levels of IgE (4). A remarkable number of experiments in various disease-prone mouse strains now link defective NKT cell function with autoimmunity. Thus, initial data from Gombert et al. (5, 6), subsequently confirmed by other groups (7, 8), showed a major deficiency of NKT cell numbers in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice, a well-established model of spontaneous, autoimmune T-cell mediated insulin-dependent diabetes (9). Both the number of NOD NKT cells and the functional capacity of these cells, as assessed by IL-4 release following TCR ligation, are dramatically reduced (5–8, 10). Moreover, in vivo treatment with the specific NKT cell TCR ligand α-galactosyl ceramide (α-GalCer, a glycolipid derived from a marine sponge) prevents disease in NOD mice (10, 11). Over-expression of NKT cell-associated Vα14Jα281 TCR chain in transgenic mice has a similar effect (12). Conversely, the onset of diabetes was recently reported to be accelerated in NOD mice lacking CD1d expression (13, 14), again consistent with a pathogenic role for NKT cell deficiency. Work in another model of autoimmunity, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), also provides evidence that NKT cells help control this pathogenic process. Mice of the SJL strain, which exhibit a unique tendency to develop chronic EAE, show the same numerical and functional NKT cell deficiency as NOD mice (15). NKT cell activation using α-GalCer protects mice from EAE (16–18). NOD mice harboring the Vα14Jα281 TCR transgene are protected from EAE (19), just as they are for diabetes (12). This compelling evidence from the two best established animals models of autoimmunity provided the rationale for investigating the role of NKT cells in human autoimmune disease. Unfortunately, such studies in human patients are intrinsically limited by the poor representation of NKT cells among circulating mononuclear cells. In their report in this issue of the JCI, Albert Bendelac’s group has characterized NKT cells using double staining with a CD1d–α-GalCer tetramer and a Vα24 specific antibody. They find that the numbers of NKT cells do not differ between diabetic patients, subjects at high risk for developing the disease, and normal controls (20). IL-4 production by NKT cells was also similar among these groups, as assessed by intracytoplasmic staining following short-term PMA and ionomycin stimulation (20). These observations are in clear distinction with previous reports showing both a numerical and a functional defect in the IL-4 producing ability of NKT cells in diabetic patients, as compared to both discordant twins and normal controls (21, 22). At this stage, it is hard to interpret the discrepancies between these results, since the methods for detecting NKT cells and the functional assays employed differ significantly between these studies. While the use of CD1d tetramers in the present report (20) adds considerably to the specificity of detection, this protocol may also identify low avidity tetramer-binding cells whose biological relevance is questionable. Moreover, the assumption that α-GalCer binds to all NKT cells may be incorrect in light of some reports showing that there are invariant and non-invariant CD1d-restricted T cells that do not respond to this COMMENTARY